A surveillance software vendor has proposed combining exported Flock Safety imagery with facial-recognition capabilities in a separate evidence platform, according to reporting based on a sales approach to a Tennessee police department. The proposal highlights how data can acquire new analytical uses after it leaves the system that originally collected it.
The proposed integration is not a deployed Flock feature
VIDIZMO described bringing Flock data, body-camera footage and other evidence into its Intelligence Hub for search and analysis. The company’s chief executive told reporters that it had not used facial recognition on Flock footage and had not built the specific export tool required for the proposed workflow.
Flock states that its cameras do not use facial recognition and that its license-plate system searches vehicle characteristics rather than identity. The proposed biometric analysis would therefore occur downstream in another vendor’s environment, not inside Flock cameras or Flock’s own recognition process.
Data-governance boundaries must survive export
Agencies evaluating video integrations should define allowed analytics, retention, audit logging and approval requirements before moving evidence between platforms. Procurement controls should address downstream processing as well as the capabilities of the original camera system. SectechMedia follows related developments in its video surveillance and imaging coverage.
Leave a Reply